Handling Ambiguity
Assisting inspectors handling ambiguity in policies and regulation to ensure more fair and consistent enforcement in inspections.
Dutch government inspectorates are responsible for safeguarding public interests, from food safety and fair working conditions to educational quality and environmental protection. To ensure fairness in the execution of regulations and policies, it is important that inspectors are aligned on the interpretation. In practice, this can be challenging due to the ambiguity in those regulations and policies. Our research sits within the AI4Oversight lab, where we work hand in hand with multiple inspectorates to co-develop AI tools that can help with tackling this ambiguity in practice.
Key challenges in this domain
Regulations and policies can often be interpreted differently by different experts. Unfortunately, most conventional methods assume a singular ground truth, meaning that novel methods and datasets may be required to effectively capture regulatory ambiguity and detect gray areas. It is also important that users can judge output quality to accurately detect poor assessments, which creates a need for interpretable models and explainable outputs. Additionally, inspectorates regularly work with sensitive documents, meaning that using externally hosted LLMs such as ChatGPT may not be feasible, which creates a requirement for models that can be run locally.
Research Questions
How well do existing fine-tuned NLI methods perform on pairs of regulatory texts and policy texts?
How to tune or present explanations to a specific expert-group?
How well does an instruction-tuned LLM perform on pairs of regulatory texts and policy texts?
How to explain the outcomes of NLI and instruction-tuned LLMs with Post-Hoc XAI methods such as mechanistic interpretability?
How to best combine retrieval methods and human filtering to select the texts that need to be compared?
Solutions
We propose to build AI-driven tools that seamlessly integrate fairness and transparency into inspection planning. Rather than delivering a single, black-box recommendation, our system offers a range of balanced options that reflect different trade-offs between effectiveness, equity, and clarity. Users can explore these options through intuitive visual interfaces that highlight fairness metrics and provide clear explanations for why certain cases are prioritized, empowering inspectorates to make informed and trustworthy decisions.
Meet the researcher
Farrukh Bharatov
Leiden University
I obtained my master's degree in Artificial Intelligence from the University of Amsterdam in 2024. In July 2025, I began my PhD at Leiden University. In my free time, I like to cook and play video games.